In my previous column, Decision Dependency, I shared how what initially appeared to be a collections problem turned out to be the financial consequence of a much deeper operating condition. The same engagement uncovered another condition that affected the business in an entirely different way.
This time, the financial statements pointed us toward labor costs.
At first glance, the numbers seemed straightforward. Payroll costs were increasing and margins were becoming more difficult to maintain.
For many businesses, that's enough to conclude that labor costs are too high. Sometimes that's true. But identifying the financial issue isn't the same as identifying the business condition causing it.
A business may genuinely need more people. It may have outgrown its systems and processes. It may be carrying more operational complexity than its structure can support.
Or it may be paying people to perform work the business never intended to create.
Those are very different conditions.
Yet they can produce the same financial symptom, while requiring very different decision paths.
As we continued working with this client, we started looking beyond the payroll expense itself and paid closer attention to how people were actually spending their time.
Employees were spending increasing amounts of time answering customer questions that shouldn't have required clarification, resolving invoice disputes, correcting billing issues, and providing services that had gradually fallen outside the customer's contractual agreement.
These were the same operating workarounds that had contributed to the billing inconsistencies I described in my last column. Viewed through a different financial lens, they were also creating hours of work the business had never intentionally designed, measured, or priced.
None of those activities appeared unusual on their own. Each one had simply become another exception that was accepted as part of the normal day. Over time, those exceptions quietly consumed capacity and profit margins.
The payroll expense was real.
The work was real.
What wasn't immediately visible was that much of the organization's capacity was being consumed by work that wasn't creating additional value.
The financial statements didn’t reveal the invisible work. They simply reflected the cost and slimmer margins.
This is invisible work.
Not because the work itself is hidden.
But because it becomes so familiar that the business stops recognizing it as something worth questioning.
It simply becomes "the way we do things."
The financial consequences eventually appear.
Margins become more difficult to maintain. In industries where margins are already tight, even a relatively small amount of invisible work can have a significant financial impact.
Capacity feels increasingly constrained. Hiring additional people provides temporary relief, but the pressure soon returns because the underlying condition hasn't changed.
Invisible work isn't the only explanation for rising labor costs.
Sometimes the business truly needs more people.
Sometimes the operating structure hasn't kept pace with growth.
Sometimes pricing no longer reflects the effort required to serve customers.
But invisible work is one possibility that financial statements alone cannot reveal.
As accountants, we naturally look for answers in the numbers.
The numbers are where the conversation begins.
They rarely tell us where it should end.
Because our role isn't simply to explain why labor costs increased.
It's to understand the business conditions that caused them to increase in the first place.
The numbers identify the symptom.
Our job is to understand the condition.
Read Linda's other articles HERE